85
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance of the Mobility Sizing Technique Relative to Independent Diagnostics for the Characterization of Polydisperse Soot Aggregates

, , &
Pages 1526-1548 | Received 05 Feb 2009, Accepted 31 Aug 2009, Published online: 07 Dec 2009
 

Abstract

Accurate characterizations of particulate matter based on reliable measurement techniques are essential to monitor, regulate, and model atmospheric pollution levels, so that a unified scientific database can be achieved to guide progress in air quality and emission policies. Of particular interests are the relevant sizes of combustion-generated particulates that are typically fractal aggregates of small spherical primary particles. In this study, three independent diagnostics—mobility particle sizer, transmission electron microscopy, and laser scattering and extinction—were critically compared and evaluated for their abilities and limitations in characterizing properties of polydisperse soot populations emitted from well-defined laboratory flames. For the present experimental conditions, microscopy and optical measurements were found to agree not only with each other but also with past studies. While the mobility sizing technique could not reveal information on spherule diameters and fractal properties due to the spherical particle assumption, it yielded overall equivalent sizes that were comparable to aggregate sizes. The measured mobility diameters, however, differed from the other two techniques for aggregate size distributions and were not consistent with expected sooting behaviors when the flame conditions were changed. The maximum discrepancy between the mobility and optical measurements was a factor of three for particle volume fraction and more than an order of magnitude for specific surface area. These results suggest further experimental and theoretical investigations on the correspondence between mobility diameter and actual properties of aggregated particulate matter.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

National Science Foundation (Grant CTS-9711954), University of Missouri Research Board, and University of Missouri Center of Excellence for Aerospace Particulate Emissions Reduction Research sponsored this research. The authors would like to thank Mr. Max Trueblood for his assistance with mobility sizing instruments.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.