ABSTRACT
The particle size distribution (PSD) measurements of coarse fly-ash particles (diameter, dp >10 µm) near the depositing surface are often not available, creating challenges in formulating mechanistic models for ash deposition. This void may be partially alleviated if measurements of deposition rate and PSD of the ash deposits are available. This is demonstrated using well-resolved Computational Fluid Dynamic simulations in conjunction with a particle viscosity and particle kinetic energy based capture criterion to model the outer ash deposition processes for three different fuels (two types of coal and Rice Husk) during their combustion in AIR and O2/CO2 (70/30 vol %, OXY70; 50/50 vol %, OXY50) oxidizer compositions. First, deposition rate predictions for monodisperse fly-ash particles (10 µm < dp < 150 µm) encompassing the aforementioned scenarios were carried out. The PSD of the fly-ash particles were then inferred by mass-weighted averaging the monodisperse fly-ash diameters to match the measured deposition rates as well as the deposit ash PSD. While the methodology proved to be promising in the coal-firing scenarios, the deposit ash PSD predictions for Rice Husk were smaller than their corresponding measurements and may be attributed to irregular particle sizes or necessary modifications to surface capture characteristics.
Nomenclature
CD | = | Particle drag coefficient |
d | = | diameter, m |
PKE | = | Particle kinetic energy, J |
Re | = | Particle Reynolds Number |
Stk | = | Stokes Number |
T | = | Temperature, K |
V | = | velocity, m/s |
= | mass fraction in fly-ash | |
= | mass fraction in ash deposit | |
Greek Symbols | = | |
= | density, kg/m3 | |
= | Viscosity, kg/m-s | |
= | Efficiency (impaction or capture) | |
Subscripts | = | |
p | = | denotes particle |
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).