67
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Modelling Outer Ash Deposition Rates in Second Generation Atmospheric Pressure Oxy-Fuel Combustion Systems

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3440-3455 | Received 04 May 2023, Accepted 22 Jun 2023, Published online: 23 Jul 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The particle size distribution (PSD) measurements of coarse fly-ash particles (diameter, dp >10 µm) near the depositing surface are often not available, creating challenges in formulating mechanistic models for ash deposition. This void may be partially alleviated if measurements of deposition rate and PSD of the ash deposits are available. This is demonstrated using well-resolved Computational Fluid Dynamic simulations in conjunction with a particle viscosity and particle kinetic energy based capture criterion to model the outer ash deposition processes for three different fuels (two types of coal and Rice Husk) during their combustion in AIR and O2/CO2 (70/30 vol %, OXY70; 50/50 vol %, OXY50) oxidizer compositions. First, deposition rate predictions for monodisperse fly-ash particles (10 µm < dp < 150 µm) encompassing the aforementioned scenarios were carried out. The PSD of the fly-ash particles were then inferred by mass-weighted averaging the monodisperse fly-ash diameters to match the measured deposition rates as well as the deposit ash PSD. While the methodology proved to be promising in the coal-firing scenarios, the deposit ash PSD predictions for Rice Husk were smaller than their corresponding measurements and may be attributed to irregular particle sizes or necessary modifications to surface capture characteristics.

Nomenclature

CD=

Particle drag coefficient

d=

diameter, m

PKE=

Particle kinetic energy, J

Re=

Particle Reynolds Number

Stk=

Stokes Number

T=

Temperature, K

V=

velocity, m/s

x=

mass fraction in fly-ash

y=

mass fraction in ash deposit

Greek Symbols=
ρ=

density, kg/m3

μ=

Viscosity, kg/m-s

η=

Efficiency (impaction or capture)

Subscripts=
p=

denotes particle

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research was partially funded through the University Coal Research Program being administered by DOE-NETL (Award Number: DE-FE0031741).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.