82
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Manure Phosphorus Fractions: Development of Analytical Methods and Variation with Manure TypesFootnote

, &
Pages 935-947 | Received 01 Jun 2005, Accepted 10 Feb 2006, Published online: 25 Apr 2007
 

Abstract

Manure phosphorus (P) extraction and storage procedures were evaluated, and manure types were characterized for extractable P. The objectives of this research were to evaluate manure P extraction and sample storage procedures and to characterize manure types for water‐extractable P (WEP) and NaHCO3 P (BiEP). Manure P was extracted at dry matter–to–water extraction ratios of 0.5 g/200 mL, 2 g/200 mL, 2 g/20 mL, and 20 g/200 mL. Shaking times of 0.5 h, 1 h, or 2 h were evaluated along with filter paper types (Whatman No. 42, Whatman No. 40, and 0.45‐µm). Single or sequential extractions and repeated extractions with water or NaHCO3 were also compared on various manure sources. Manure types were treated as replications in the analysis of variance to reduce the probability of making a Type I error in applying the results to diverse manure types. Dry matter–to–water extraction ratios more concentrated than 1 g/100 mL removed less P than extraction at 1 g/200 mL, which removed a similar percentage of total P (TP) as 0.5 g/200 mL ratio. A single extraction with a 1 g/200 mL or more dilute ratio with 1 h of shaking time was found to give a good estimate of extractible P. Extracted manure P was similar for three sequential extractions of 1 g/100 mL dilution ratio compared to one extraction with 1 g/300 mL. Filter paper type did not affect the amount of P extracted. Phosphorus extraction was more consistent with samples stored dry as compared to refrigerated or frozen conditions. Extractible P in swine manure, as a percentage of TP, was more than for other manure types.

Acknowledgment

This publication was made possible through support provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Grant No. LAG‐G‐00‐96‐900009‐00.

Notes

A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, Lincoln, Nebraska. journal series no. 14475.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.