![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
Particulate organic matter (POM) is recognized as a valuable measure of labile soil organic matter. The method usually requires hand‐sieving through a 2‐mm sieve. Hand‐sieving has not been widely adopted by soil testing laboratories, where samples are generally mechanically ground. Composites of 20–25 cores (2×15 cm) were collected from a long‐term crop rotation×fertility treatment study in central Pennsylvania and from 11 central and eastern Pennsylvania farms. Subsamples of each sample were hand‐sieved through a 2‐mm sieve or mechanically ground and analyzed for POM carbon (C). The POM‐C of hand‐sieved and ground samples were similar except for one site with large POM concentrations; at this site, grinding generated lower POM‐C yields than hand‐sieving. Grinding soil samples may be an effective means to increase the availability of POM analysis, but additional work is necessary to determine if this method decreases POM yield, particularly in high POM samples.