111
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Impact of Feedlot Manure Application on Hydrology, Soil Carbon, and Nutrient Loss

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2968-2981 | Received 24 Mar 2021, Accepted 07 Jul 2022, Published online: 12 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Feedlot manure is a potentially valuable resource to provide plant nutrients and improve soil. A field experiment was undertaken with the objective of determining the effect of feedlot manure applications on hydrology, and nutrient loss. The five treatments imposed over a three-year period were no manure or inorganic fertiliser (NM), a moderate annual manure application + N (MAN), a high initial application + N in year 1 (HIN) and an inorganic fertilizer treatment (I) applied in each year. Relay crops of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) and triticale (Triticosecale spp. cv. Madonna) were grown throughout the 3 years. EnviroCSAN multisensor capacitance probes were used for soil water measurement. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was measured in-situ using an automatic recording disc permeameter. Steady-state infiltration was determined at two tensions (40 and 10 mm). Soil moisture was consistently higher on the HIN treatment despite higher crop production. Surface runoff was highest in the NM treatment. At the end of 3 years, infiltration rate was highest in the I and M treatments. Highest losses of N occurred in the I and highest K loss in in M. Runoff P concentration exceeded an acceptable concentration in more than 86% of runoff events. Incorporation of feedlot manure into soil with minimum disturbance, coupled with relay cropping can have substantial benefits for both nutrient cycling and hydrology.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Meat and Livestock Australia and field facilities were made available at the “Tullimba” feedlot by the Beef CRC. Professional inputs by Donald MacLeod and Simon Lott significantly enhanced this study and the technical support of Leanne Lisle, Judy Kenny and Nelly Blair is gratefully acknowledged.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Meat and Livestock Australia and Australian Meat Research Committee.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.