337
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of Organic Fertilizer Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Nutrients, Enzyme Activities, and Rice Yield in Reclaimed Soil

, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3060-3071 | Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 08 Jul 2022, Published online: 16 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers (organic-chemical fertilizers) on reclaimed soil fertility and rice yield. The experiment involved five treatments: no nitrogen (N) fertilizer (CK1), 100% chemical fertilizer N (CK2), 40% chicken manure N + 60% chemical fertilizer N (T1), 40% vermicompost N + 60% chemical fertilizer N (T2), 40% rapeseed meal fertilizer N + 60% chemical fertilizer N (T3). Organic-chemical fertilizers maintained or increased rice yield. Rice yields of T2 and T3 increased by 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively, as compared with CK2. T1 showed similar value of rice yield with CK2. Organic-chemical fertilizers application increased contents of soil organic C (SOC), total N (TN), alkali-hydrolyzable N (AN), NH4+-N, NO3N, available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK) as well as CEC by 10.5%~15.9%, 8.9%~39.3%, 16.9%~74.5%, 38.1%~77.2%, 18.3%~136.5%, 27.7%~75.0%, 16.1%~24.7% and 7.2 ~ 26.0%. T3 had highest soil TN, AN, NH4+-N, NO3N, CEC as well as T2 showed the highest contents of soil AP and AK. Organic-chemical fertilizers application increased soil sucrase (S-SC), urease (S-UE) and catalase (S-CAT) activities. The highest soil S-SC activity was detected in T3, and the highest soil S-UE and soil alkaline phosphatase (S-AKP) activities were observed in T2. Rice yield was positively related to SOC, TN, AN, NH4+-N, NO3N, AP and AK as well as S-SC, S-UE and S-AKP activities. In conclusion, 40% organic N + 60% chemical N application could improve soil fertility and rice yield in reclaimed soils, with rapeseed meal fertilizer the most effective organic N source, followed by vermicompost and chicken manure.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research work was supported by the Modern Agricultural Development Program of Jiangsu (Program No. 2020-SJ-003-YD04) and the Open program of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology (Program No. YCSL202105) and the Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System of Jiangsu (Program No. JATS-2021-355).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.