340
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium on Shame

Whose Shame is it Anyway?

Lifeworlds of Humiliation and Systems of Restoration (or “The Analyst's Shame”)

Pages 83-100 | Published online: 23 Oct 2013
 

Abstract

Shame in the analytic system belongs neither to the patient nor to the analyst but is intersubjectively generated, maintained, exacerbated, and, we hope, mitigated, within the relational system. This shame arises partly from the treatment situation itself, but also from the lifeworlds of shame that each partner brings to the encounter. These lifeworlds variably emerge from humiliation processes or shame-and-blame systems in families, religions, cultures, and psychoanalytic institutes. Both shame awareness and an attitude of radical acceptance or profound recognition can help analysts to create a climate where self-respect can grow.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Donna M. Orange

Donna M. Orange, Ph.D., Psy.D. is Faculty and Supervising Analyst, Institute for the Psychoanalytic Study of Subjectivity, New York; and Faculty and Training and Supervising Analyst, ISIPSe (Institute for Specialization in Self and Relational Psychoanalysis), Rome.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.