Abstract
Shame in the analytic system belongs neither to the patient nor to the analyst but is intersubjectively generated, maintained, exacerbated, and, we hope, mitigated, within the relational system. This shame arises partly from the treatment situation itself, but also from the lifeworlds of shame that each partner brings to the encounter. These lifeworlds variably emerge from humiliation processes or shame-and-blame systems in families, religions, cultures, and psychoanalytic institutes. Both shame awareness and an attitude of radical acceptance or profound recognition can help analysts to create a climate where self-respect can grow.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Donna M. Orange
Donna M. Orange, Ph.D., Psy.D. is Faculty and Supervising Analyst, Institute for the Psychoanalytic Study of Subjectivity, New York; and Faculty and Training and Supervising Analyst, ISIPSe (Institute for Specialization in Self and Relational Psychoanalysis), Rome.