The impact of work configuration, target angle and hand force direction on upper extremity muscle activity during sub-maximal overhead work

Abstract

Overhead work has established links to upper extremity discomfort and disorders. As many jobs incorporate working overhead, this study aimed to identify working conditions requiring relatively lower muscular shoulder load. Eleven upper extremity muscles were monitored with electromyography during laboratory simulations of overhead work tasks. Tasks were defined with three criteria: work configuration (fixed, stature-specific); target angle (−15°, 0°, 15°, 30° from vertical); direction of applied hand force (pulling backwards, pushing forwards, downwards, sideways, upwards). Normalised electromyographic activity was greater for fixed configurations, particularly when pulling in a backward direction (total activity = 108.3% maximum voluntary exertion (MVE)) compared to pushing down or forward (total activity ranging from 10.5 to 17.3%MVE). Further, pulling backwards at angles of –15° and 0° showed the highest muscular demand (p < 0.05). These results suggest that, if possible, positioning overhead work in front of the body with exertions directed forwards will result in the lowest upper extremity muscle demand.

Statement of Relevance: Overhead work pervades occupational settings and is associated with risk of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The muscular intensity associated with performing overhead work was assessed in several combinations of work placement and hand force direction. These findings should have utility for designing overhead work tasks that reduce muscular exposure.

Keywords:

• electromyography
• overhead work
• work design
• muscle demand

Acknowledgements

Support for Jaclyn Chopp and Steven Fischer during completion of this study came from a Hallman Research Fellowship and an NSERC doctoral award, respectively. Additional project support came from an NSERC discovery grant held by Dr Clark Dickerson.