2,679
Views
168
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sitting patterns at work: objective measurement of adherence to current recommendations

, , &
Pages 531-538 | Received 27 Jul 2010, Accepted 14 Feb 2011, Published online: 17 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Long uninterrupted sedentary periods, independent of total sedentary time, are risk factors for poor health. There is little objective data relating to workplace sedentary behaviour and adherence to current recommendations. The sitting behaviour of office workers (n = 83) was quantified objectively using body-worn accelerometers (activPAL™) over a working week. Adherence to three different recommendations (maximum length of a sitting event of: 20 min; 30 min; 55 min) were assessed. Participants were seated at work for 5.3 ± 1.0 h/d (mean ± 1 SD), equivalent to 66 ± 12% of the working day, accrued in 27 ± 7events/d individual sitting events. Dependent on the recommendation applied, 5–20% of sitting events and 25–67% of time was accumulated in sitting events longer than current guidelines. No participants met the 20 or 30 min recommendations on every working day but seven (8%) participants met the 55 min recommendation. In conclusion, office workers spend a considerable period of their day sitting, accumulated in uninterrupted sitting events longer than current recommendations.

Statement of Relevance: Emerging evidence suggests prolonged sitting has negative health effects. In this study of office workers, 25–67% of time sitting was accumulated in events longer than minimum recommended durations. Adverse sitting behaviour is prevalent in the office, making it an appropriate setting to target the reduction of this behaviour.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the School of Health and Social Care, Glasgow Caledonian University, and no financial support was received from any commercial company. All authors contributed to the development of the research idea, collection of the data and drafting the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Danny Rafferty for creating , 2 and 3. The data for this article were collected by Sebastien Chastin, Elaine Coulter, Philippa Dall, Margaret Grant, Gillian MacLellan and Cormac Ryan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.