The effect of camera location on observation-based posture estimation

Abstract

This study used the observation-based method showing images on computer to evaluate angle estimation errors of 8 body segments in 3 motion planes at up to 28 segment angles and 5 camera locations with respect to goniometric measurements. Thirty observers participated in evaluating segment angles. Forearm (9.9°) and thigh (9.5°) had smaller errors than hand (14.0°) and foot had the smallest error (8.7°) due to its narrow range of motion (ROM). Errors were small with camera locations perpendicular to motions in the planes, such as 90° camera location for the flexion and extension of arm (6.3°), forearm (7.9°), thigh (6.5°), and leg (8.1°) in the sagittal plane. Segments had small errors of 3.1°, 4.6°, and 3.8° at segment angles of −90°, 0° and 90°, respectively. Care should be taken when estimating angles by the observation-based method for a specific segment motion and viewing direction is suggested to be perpendicular to the motion plane.

Practitioner Summary: Some companies may not allow many cameras or have obstacles for working posture evaluation in the workplace. These study results can be a guideline on proper selection of the number of cameras and their locations for a specific segment and its motion of interest to reduce visual segment angle estimation errors.

Keywords:

• visual estimation error
• whole body segment
• motion plane
• camera location

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2012R1A2A2A01005574).