Passenger comfort on high-speed trains: effect of tunnel noise on the subjective assessment of pressure variations

Abstract

When passing through a tunnel, aerodynamic effects on high-speed trains may impair passenger comfort. These variations in atmospheric pressure are accompanied by transient increases in sound pressure level. To date, it is unclear whether the latter influences the perceived discomfort associated with the variations in atmospheric pressure. In a pressure chamber of the DLR-Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 71 participants (M = 28.3 years ± 8.1 SD) rated randomised pressure changes during two conditions according to a crossover design. The pressure changes were presented together with tunnel noise such that the sound pressure level was transiently elevated by either +6 dB (low noise condition) or +12 dB (high noise condition) above background noise level (65 dB(A)). Data were combined with those of a recent study, in which identical pressure changes were presented without tunnel noise (Schwanitz et al., 2013, ‘Pressure Variations on a Train – Where is the Threshold to Railway Passenger Discomfort?’ Applied Ergonomics 44 (2): 200-209). Exposure-response relationships for the combined data set comprising all three noise conditions show that pressure discomfort increases with the magnitude and speed of the pressure changes but decreases with increasing tunnel noise.

Practitioner Summary: In a pressure chamber, we systematically examined how pressure discomfort, as it may be experienced by railway passengers, is affected by the presence of tunnel noise during pressure changes. It is shown that across three conditions (no noise, low noise (+6 dB), high noise (+12 dB)) pressure discomfort decreases with increasing tunnel noise.

Keywords::

• passenger comfort
• high-speed train
• tunnel
• pressure variations
• sound pressure level

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the participants of this study, and our colleagues at the German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Division of Flight Physiology for their assistance in the experiments. The studies were part of the project ‘Next Generation Train’ that was internally funded by the Program Directorate Transport of the German Aerospace Center.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.