Establishment of a finite element model based on craniofacial soft tissue thickness measurements and stress analysis of medical goggles

Abstract

In this study, an accurate finite element (FE) stress analysis of head-mounted products for Chinese users was performed. Using craniofacial computed tomography scans of 280 Chinese individuals, the total soft tissue thickness and thickness of the fat and muscle layers for 41 landmarks were measured. The data were used to construct FE head models (FEH). An FE stress test was conducted to analyse the wearing of medical goggles using two FE models based on one-layer (FEH 1) and three-layer (FEH 3) soft tissue material parameters. When compared with the experimental results, the modelling results for FEH 3 were more realistic than those for FEH 1. Wearing medical goggles led to stress concentration over five landmark areas, A: upper medial forehead, B: temporal, C: zygion, D: infraorbital fossa and E: rhinion, of which B, C and D caused the most discomfort during long-term goggle wear.

Practitioner summary: A precise FE head model can reflect the complex contact pressure of a head-related product. Two FE models based on one- and three-layer soft tissue material parameters were established and tested separately with medical goggles. The model can be used to improve the comfort of head-related products.

Abbreviations: FE: finite element; FEH: FE head models; FEH 1: FE models based on one-layer; FEH 3: FE models based on three-layer; VR: virtual reality; AR: augmented reality; 3D: three-dimensional; WSU: Wayne State University; WSUBIM: Wayne State University Brain Injury Model; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CFSTT: craniofacial soft tissue thickness; FSR: force sensing resistor; NURBS: non-uniform rational basis spline; SPSS: statistical product and service solutions; STL: stereolithography; STP: standard for the exchange of product model data; BDF: glyph bitmap distribution format; EEG: electroencephalogram

Keywords:

• Finite element model
• comfort
• soft tissue thickness
• contact pressure
• product design

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the School of Design of Hunan University and the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflicts of interest are reported by the author(s).