159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Physical capability limits for right-angle power tool operation

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1229-1245 | Received 09 Nov 2021, Accepted 28 Oct 2022, Published online: 11 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

Automotive assembly operations require power tools to secure fasteners and these operations have been linked to increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders. This work was designed to develop physical capability limits for direct current right-angle power tool (RAPT) operations using psychophysics. Forty females fastened joints of different hardness’s using three fastening strategies, at three fastening frequencies. Participants chose to fasten, independent of orientation, joints up to 89 (10.6) Nm using Atlas Copco’s TurboTight®, compared to 51.8 (8.1) Nm using Atlas Copco’s Quickstep and 48.6 (10.2) Nm using Stanley’s Automatic Tightening Control. The differences between fastening strategies were not as large when fastening soft joints; 59.2 (16.2), 52.3 (14.6), and 53.5 (11.3) Nm, respectively. As fastening frequency increased, participants chose lower target torque magnitudes to fasten. Based on this work, RAPT manufactures can adjust fastening strategies to improve their tool’s ergonomics performance.

Practitioner summary: Fastening tasks was identified as posing an injury risk to workers performing automotive assembly, yet presently there are no published physical capability limits for direct current right-angle power tool operation. Using a psychophysical methodology, physical capability limits for RAPT fastenings were established for different joint hardness, fastening frequencies and RAPT position/orientation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge that this work was based on a master’s thesis completed by Jonathan Valencia, Valencia, Jonathan. (2018). Ergonomics determination of physical capability limits while using right angle power tools. University of Windsor. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 7483. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7483

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (APCPJ 459726).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.