176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of fire protective equipment and the self-contained breathing apparatus on peak exercise in males and females

Pages 1884-1891 | Received 03 Mar 2022, Accepted 31 Dec 2022, Published online: 26 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

With an increase in the number of females entering the fire service it is important to understand the potential impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on females. This study compared selected physiological responses during two graded exercise tests (GXT) performed in a counterbalanced design: GXTPT – wearing athletic clothing while breathing through a low-resistance valve; and GXTPPE – wearing PPE and breathing from a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). Sixteen males and 15 females acted as participants. V˙O2peak was significantly lower, by approximately 15%, during the GXTPPE compared to the GXTPT condition for both the males and females. Physiologically, the decreased oxygen consumption was strongly related to an attenuated ventilation (r = 0.75 and 0.71) and oxygen pulse (r = 0.94 and 0.93) for the males and females, respectively. The results of this investigation demonstrate that the SCBA and PPE impacts males and females to a similar relative extent and manner.

Practitioner summary: Little information exists regarding the impact of the SCBA and PPE on physiological parameters for females. This investigation determined that females have reduced exercise capacities to the same extent as males, which should be considered when evaluating the aerobic demands of fire suppression work and the fitness levels of firefighters.

Abbreviations: GXT: graded exercise test; SCBA: self-contained breathing apparatus; personal protective equipment; MMC: metabolic measurement cart; ANOVA: analysis of variance; RPE: rating of percieved exertion; PRD: perceptions of respiratory distress; PTD: percieved thermal distress; V˙O2: rate of oxygen consumption; V˙O2peak: rate of oxygen consumption at peak exercise; V˙Epeak: minute ventilation at peak exercise; V˙E/V˙CO2: ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FEF25-75%: forced expiratory flow; PEF: peak expiratory flow rate; MVV: maximum voluntary ventilation.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to recognize the contributions of A. Clarke and K. Olson’s assistance in the data collection. The author gratefully acknowledges the efforts of the participants in this research project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Preliminary data analysis for this article was published as part of a conference abstract (Dreger and Petersen Citation2008).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.