Comparative pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Platanus: Implications for phylogeny and evaluation of the fossil record

Abstract

Pollen of Platanus was studied using light (LM) and electron microscopy (SEM and TEM). Overall, pollen is uniform in modern Platanus (small, tricolpate, prolate to spheroidal, reticulate, semitectate). A number of characters, however, display remarkable variability within a taxon and even a single anther (size; foveo‐reticulate, fine to coarse reticulate ornamentation). Platanus kerrii (subgenus Castaneophyllum) differs from the remaining species by its high and “folded” reticulum and possibly the smooth colpus membrane. Moreover, to our knowledge, pollen of the P. kerrii – type is not known from the fossil record. The exine in modern and fossil Platanaceae shows great structural similarity, but the thickness of the foot layer within the ectexine is less variable and normally smaller in modern taxa. Furthermore, in Early Cretaceous to Early Cainozoic Platanaceae a number of distinct pollen types occurred that are not known within the modern Platanus. Considering pollen of Platanaceae from the Early Cretaceous to today, a dynamic picture of the evolution of the family emerges. In the first phase (Early Cretaceous) pollen of extinct genera such as Aquia differed considerably from modern Platanus and shows strong similarity to basal eudicot taxa such as Ranunculales (e.g. Lardizabalaceae). The Late Cretaceous Platananthus hueberi displays a distinct coarse reticulum that is unknown from modern Platanus but similar to some taxa of Hamamelidaceae (e.g. Exbucklandia). After the first phase of eudicot radiation that appears to have been characterized by strongly reticulate evolution, platanaceous diversity decreased in the course of the Cainozoic. Despite this, the pollen type of the modern subgenus Castaneophyllum (P. kerrii type) seems to be an innovation that originated after the initial radiation of the family.

Keywords:

• Eudicots
• evolution
• intraspecific variability
• subgenus Castaneophyllum
• subgenus Platanus

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Susana Magallón and Gerardo Salazar for facilitating the work at MEXU and to Pollyanna von Knorring for producing the line drawings. Else Marie Friis, Madeline Harley, Steven Manchester, and Ruth Stockey provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council (Grant No 621‐2002‐5542 to David Cantrill).