![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
In this paper we analyze the algorithms expressed as a system of recurrence equations. The algorithms are called 2∗1 output algorithms if two output values of one function (variable identification) are specified by the system of recurrence equations for each index point in the algorithm. The algorithm is in free form if the indexes of these two values are not dependent. Two standard classes are determined by this criteria: the nearest neighbour and the all pair form. For example the sorting algorithm can be expressed in the all pair form i.e., the linear insertion algorithm or in the nearest neighbour form i.e., the bubble sort algorithm. However these algorithms are different in their nature. A procedure to eliminate the computational broadcast for the all pair 2∗1output algorithm has been proposed by the authors in [1]. The result obtained by implementing this procedure was a localized form of the algorithm and a system of uniform recurrence equations by eliminating the computational and data broadcast. So he data dependence method can be efficiently used for parallel implementations. The proposed procedure cannot be implemented directly on the nearest neighbour form algorithms. Here we show how the algorithm can be restructured into a form where the computational and data broadcast can be eliminated. These transformations result in localized algorithms. A few examples show how these algorithms can be implemented on processor arrays. For example, the Gentleman Kung triangular array [2] can be used for solving the QR decomposition algorithm for both forms of the algorithm. The implementations differ in the order of the data flow and the processor operation. We show that the implementation of the nearest neighbour algorithm is even better than the standard one.