This paper is an effort to evaluate the existing literature on comparative environmental politics and policy from the viewpoints of intra‐disciplinary accumulation of knowledge and extra‐disciplinary, or “practical,” relevance; the notion being that political scientists can better promote practical solutions to pressing environmental problems by bringing their disciplinary heritage to bear on studies of environmental politics, than by trying to become ecologists or engineers. On the basis of the evaluation, a number of propositions are put forward for further testing and research.
The comparative study of environmental politics: from garbage to gold?
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.