Divergent principles in third world rural planning: a case study on impoldering

Third World rural planning involves the transfer of First World technologies to the socially and ecologically vulnerable tropical environment. This transfer is guided by normative, “ideological” views concerning social and environmental issues which often remain implicit. To uncover these views, a content analysis of a series of papers has been carried out, focused on impoldering as a type of project with far reaching social and environmental impacts. Three types of “ideologies” could be distinguished, which have been labelled as sociocratic, eco‐sociocratic and technocratic. They differentiate significantly with regard to (1) values attached to ecological and cultural systems, (2) preferred pace and scale of projects, (3) envisaged project feasibility, (4) the range of feasible alternatives, as well as (5) the institutional background of their adherents. The latter separation, however, is not complete. This may stimulate the growth of insight in the normative background of the seemingly objective rationality of project design.

Key words:

• planning
• environment
• wetlands
• impoldering
• ideologies