457
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Intravenous sodium valproate in status epilepticus: review and Meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 70-84 | Received 17 Sep 2019, Accepted 09 Feb 2020, Published online: 02 Mar 2020
 

Abstract

Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE.

Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I2 < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Results:Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83–4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60–2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17–1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05–9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02–33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09–0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04–2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34–1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01–0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01–0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37–1.24)].

Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical approval

A meta-analysis is based on published studies. Therefore, patient consent and ethical approval of the study are not required.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as it is based on data from published studies.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.