87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Outcome of pallidal stimulation of idiopathic generalized dystonia with predominant mobile truncal dystonia: case report

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 429-433 | Received 15 Apr 2020, Accepted 27 Aug 2020, Published online: 16 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Background

Further reports are required to describe the outcome of truncal dystonia treated by bilateral pallidal stimulation (globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation [GPi-DBS]), owing to the small number of reports and clinical variability and complexity of truncal dystonia. Retrospectively, we report our experience of treating three patients with idiopathic generalized dystonia, with predominant mobile truncal dystonia by bilateral GPi-DBS.

Methods

Three patients with idiopathic generalized dystonia underwent bilateral GPi-DBS. One patient had adult-onset dystonia, while two patients had childhood-onset dystonia. All patients had predominant mobile truncal dystonia of mixed abnormal postures (camptocormia and lateral tilt), while one patient had also truncal twist. Patients were assessed pre- and post-GPi-DBS using the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Dystonia Disability Scale (DDS).

Results

The three patients showed marked improvement of global (94.78%, 92.4% and 80.95%) and truncal BFMDRS (all abnormal postures) (87.5%, 93.75% and 87.5%) and DDS (95.84% and 50%), using high amplitude monopolar settings, with a dramatic improvement of the mobile component. Improvement was persistent for 1.5, 3 and 6 years.

Conclusion

Bilateral GPi-DBS improves markedly the mobile truncal dystonia and associated abnormal postures in patients with adult and childhood-onset idiopathic generalized dystonia. Improvement was persistent for up to 6 years.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University. All subjects gave written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.