Work centre-based decomposition approaches, especially variants of the Shifting Bottleneck algorithm, have been very successful in solving job-shop-scheduling problems. These methods decompose the problem into subproblems involving a single work centre (usually a single machine), which they solve sequentially. We propose new measures of subproblem criticality and show via computational experiments that several of these provide solutions comparable in quality with those obtained from previous work in substantially less central processing unit time.
Measures of subproblem criticality in decomposition algorithms for shop scheduling
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.