84
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols on Glass-Fiber Post Adhesion Performance After Aging and Flexural Strength

, &
Pages 755-768 | Received 15 Oct 2012, Accepted 09 Dec 2012, Published online: 03 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

The effect of surface-conditioning of fiber-posts on the flexural strength of the post and on the adhesion between the root dentin and cement and between the fiber-post and the composite core were assessed. The fiber-posts were subjected to cleaning with alcohol (AL), treatment with AL + silane (SIL), sandblasting with Al2O3 particles + SIL, H2O2 etching + SIL, hydrofluoric acid etching + SIL, and H3PO4 etching + SIL. For comparison, another group of specimens was left unconditioned (control group). The conditioned fiber-posts were cemented to bovine roots, and standardized cylindrical resin cores were fabricated. The specimens were subjected to 106 mechanical pulses and then sectioned perpendicular to the long axis of the root. Push-out tests were conducted on the sliced root sections, and microtensile testing was applied to the trimmed sliced core sections. The posts were also subjected to three-point bending tests. The surface-conditioning did not have any significant effect on the push-out strength. However, silanization increased the microtensile strength at the resin core. Sandblasting significantly decreased the flexural strength as compared to other surface treatments. Our study indicates that post surface-conditioning did not improve the post retention in the root canal, although silanization enhanced the adhesion to the core resin. Sandblasting with 125-µm alumina particles should be avoided.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development for financial support (process numbers 133343/2009-0 and 470365/2009-9), FGM Dental Products for donating materials, and Special Program for International Publications/PRPGP/UFSM for language support.

Notes

a) Cleaning with 96° alcohol.

b) Application of silane coupling agent (Ceramic Primer, 3 M/ESPE) followed by 5 min of rest for drying.

c) Sandblasting with 125-µm Al2O3 (distance = 10 mm, perpendicular to surface, for 20 s, pressure of 2.8 bar).

d) Immersion in 10% H2O2 for 20 min, rinsing, and drying.

e) Etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 1 min, rinsing, and drying.

f) Etching with 37% phosphoric acid (H3PO4) for 1 min, rinsing, and drying.

*Adhes CD: Adhesive failure between cement and dentin.

Adhes PC: Adhesive failure between post and cement.

Cohes P: Cohesive failure of the post.

Cohes PD: Cohesive failure of post and dentin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.