Abstract
Increasingly, there are calls for the school curriculum to reflect the real‐world needs of students, such as the need to make difficult choices as citizens. The science curriculum is not exempt from these reappraisals of the relevance of what occurs in schools. Approaches to science involving social contexts are increasingly common, and with them demands for teachers to exercise new skills in curriculum‐making. What are those skills and what is required to develop them? We argue that discourse among teachers is centrally involved in the process of re‐invigourating the curriculum.
Notes
1. Materials developed in the PING project are now being used for teaching and teacher education in various German states. However, the requirement for discipline‐based assessment has imposed a barrier to the adoption of this approach in the upper‐school grades.
2. Details of how this worked can be found in Riquarts and Hansen (Citation1998).
3. All participants need to accept the basic rule that they are equal partners of equal value with equal rights in the discourse. The methods of the workshop are based on theories of curriculum justification (Frey Citation1983), formal or procedural ethics (Oser Citation1992, Löwisch Citation2000) and structured argumentation in problem‐solving (Toulmin Citation1958, Jonassen and Remidez Citation2002).
4. The waste audit produces information of some complexity; students and teachers are typically surprised at just how much waste was in the school.
5. This was a surprise, since students spent less actual time studying school science in this approach.
Riquarts
,
K.
and
Hansen
,
K.‐H.
1998
.
Collaboration among teachers, researchers and in‐service trainers to develop an integrated science curriculum
.
Journal of Curriculum Studies
,
30
(6)
:
661
–
676
.
Frey
,
K.
1983
.
Curriculum‐Konferenz zum Gebiet Lehrerfortbildung Schwerpunkt Schule. Programmheft
,
Kiel,
, Germany
:
IPN
.
Oser
,
F. K.
1992
.
“
Morality in professional action: a discourse approach for teaching
”
. In
Effective and Responsible Teaching: A New Synthesis
,
Edited by:
Oser
,
F. K.
,
Dick
,
A.
and
Patry
,
J.‐L.
109
–
125
.
San Francisco, CA
:
Jossey‐Bass
.
Löwisch
,
D.‐J.
2000
.
Pädagogische Ethik und Normativität einer diskusiven Verantwortungsethik
.
Pädagogische Rundschau
,
54
:
377
–
384
.
Toulmin
,
S.
1958
.
The use of Arguments
,
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
.
Jonassen
,
D. H.
and
Remidez
,
H.
2002
.
Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences
,
Boulder, CO
:
Foundations for a CSCL Community
.
Available online at: http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/12.html (visited 25 May 2005)
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Manfred Lang
His research interests centre on teacher education, networking, integrated science teaching, and discourse in collaborative curriculum development. He is currently co‐ordinator of the project EUDIST, about innovation in European science‐teacher education.
Susan Drake
Her research interests revolve around educational reform, innovative educational practices (integrated curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment, collaborative planning), narrative research, action research, and self‐study.
John Olson
He is interested in the role of the teacher in change. He is author of Understanding Teaching: Beyond Expertise (Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1992).