1,447
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher candidates’ opinions and experiences as input for teacher education curriculum developmentFootnote*

, , , , &
 

Abstract

The aim of this international study was to generate recommendations for curriculum improvement in family–school partnerships (FSP) by examining teacher candidates’ understandings, attitudes and experiences. A survey of 1144 candidates in their first or final year of preparation at three universities, one each in Belgium, the Netherlands and the USA, provided qualitative and quantitative data regarding their understandings, attitudes about FSP and their experiences in their teacher preparation. The data indicated modest approval of the value of partnerships, understandings of partnerships weighted towards teacher to parent communication, preference for traditional teacher–parent activities over non-traditional choices, and, among final year candidates, mildly positive feelings of preparedness. Candidates wished more interactions with parents during field experiences and practical strategies for communicating with parents. Inferred in their responses was the need for curriculum to develop an expanded view of partnerships, enhance attitudes, especially among secondary education candidates, and cultivate skills in working with families from culturally diverse backgrounds. However, few candidates expressed a desire for exploring theory and research on partnerships or for the opportunity to develop a personal philosophy, components which are thought critical for teachers’ ability to establish partnerships with parents.

Notes

* The research was conducted at the William Paterson University (USA); Windesheim University of Applied Sciences (The Netherlands); University Colleges Leuven-Limburg (Belgium)

1. Both of the European Universities are Dutch-speaking.

2. The units of measure in the Family involvement teacher efficacy scale of Garcia (Citation2004) were adapted. Instead of a 6-point Likert-scale, a 100-point rating scale was used, based on Bandura’s (Citation2006) arguments that these types of scales provide better possibilities to respondents to rate their efficacy.

3. Country of origin is indicated as: BE = Belgium; NL = Netherlands; US = United States of America.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.