Abstract
Research consistently documents negative consequences for children who are cyber victims, underscoring the need to examine effective management. Disclosure to friends about cyber victimization is advocated; however, research is limited. The present research examined willingness to disclose to friends about being cyber victimized for fourth graders and evaluated the subsequent frequency of cyber victimization when in grade 5 (N = 207). Three groups in Grade 4 were identified: No Victimization, Victimization/No Tell, and Victimization/Tell. Children in the Victimization/Tell group reported a significantly lower frequency of cyber victimization a year later. The Victimization/No Tell group of children did not report a statistically reduced frequency of cyber victimization. The number of classroom mutual friends was ruled out as an explanation. This research supports the use of a strategy for children confiding with friends to reduce subsequent cyber victimization.
Keywords:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Alec Sisco
Alec D. Sisco is a graduate student at the University of Memphis, a clinical research associate at Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, and a research assistant in collaboration with the University of Tennessee Knoxville. His research interests include child and family studies, where he focuses on issues related to cyberbullying and traditional bullying; disproportionality and LGBTQ + intersectionality; friendships and antipathies; and assessment equity.
Robert Cohen
Robert Cohen is a developmental psychologist and Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Memphis. His research interests focus on elementary school-aged children’s peer social relations. Specific topics include traditional and cyber, aggression and victimization; friendships and antipathies; peer group liking and popularity; the association of loneliness, peer optimism, and respect for peer social competence.