The Siegel‐Ofshe two‐component repetitive choice model, while demonstrating great predictive accuracy, is difficult to interpret and is very data‐inefficient. Reasons for these shortcomings are analyzed in detail, and a modified model is suggested. The new model can be more easily interpreted, provides greater data‐efficiency, and furthermore, holds up well when tested with available data. The importance of the new “discrimination” model for sociology lies mainly with two factors: first, it can explain deviations from gain maximization, and second, it demonstrates that individuals do not act directly on the basis of values (utility) but rather on the basis of marginal utility. A comparison of the discrimination model with the Camilleri‐Berger model (a model in which marginal utility plays no role) favors the former.
Marginal utility and restraints on gain maximization: The discrimination model of rational, repetitive choice
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.