Concurrent Directional Adaptation of Reactive Saccades and Hand Movements to Target Displacements of Different Size

ABSTRACT

When eye and hand movements are concurrently aimed at double-step targets that call for equal and opposite changes of response direction (–10° for the eyes, +10° for the hand), adaptive recalibration of both motor systems is strongly attenuated; instead, hand but not eye movements are changed by corrective strategies (V. Grigorova et al., 2013a). The authors introduce a complementary paradigm, where double-step targets call for a –10° change of eye and a −30° change for hand movements. If compared to control subjects adapting only the eyes or only the hand, adaptive improvements were comparable for the eyes but were twice as large for the hand; in contrast, eye and hand aftereffects were comparable to those in control subjects. The authors concluded that concurrent exposure of eyes and hand to steps of the same direction but different size facilitated hand strategies, but didn't affect recalibration. This finding together with previous one (V. Grigorova et al., 2013a), suggests that concurrent adaptation of eyes and hand reveals different mechanisms of recalibration for step sign and step size, which are shared by reactive saccades and hand movements. However, hand mostly benefits from strategies provoked by the difference in target step sign and size.

Keywords:

• coordination
• motion planning
• motor learning
• saccadic eye movements

Note

Notes

1. This suggestion resembled somewhat to previous adaptation sensorimotor research which provided evidence for categorical adaptation that is sensitive to the sign of perturbations (Fine & Thoroughman, 2006; Wei, Wert, & Körding, 2010), as well as for proportional adaptation that operates on the average perturbation magnitude over several trials (Scheidt, Dingwell, & Mussa-Ivaldi, 2001).