Movement Integration and the One-Target Advantage

ABSTRACT

The 1-target advantage (OTA) has been found to occur in many circumstances and the current best explanation for this phenomenon is that of the movement integration hypothesis. The author's purpose is twofold: (a) to model the conditions under which there is integration of the movement components in a 2-component movement and (b) to study the factors that determine the magnitude of the OTA for both the first and second component of a 2-component movement. Results indicate that integration of movement components, where times for one component are affected by the geometry of the other component, occurs when 1 of the movement components is made ballistically. Movement components that require ongoing visual control show only weak interaction with the second component, whereas components made ballistically always show movement time dependence on first and second component amplitude, independent of location within the sequence. The OTA is present on both the first and second components of the movement, with a magnitude that is dependent on whether the components are performed ballistically or with ongoing visual control and also on the amplitudes and indexes of difficulty of the component movements.

Keywords:

• ballistic and visually controlled movements
• movement integration hypothesis
• one-target advantage
• sequential movements