138
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Variability of daily nest survival and breeding success in relation to characteristics of Eurasian magpie (Pica pica) nests

, , , &
Pages 729-738 | Received 15 Oct 2012, Accepted 22 May 2013, Published online: 20 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Size and structure of birds’ nests can arise from evolutionary trade-offs between benefits, such as insulation from unfavourable conditions, maintenance of eggs or chicks, security against predation, and costs, such as energy spent in construction of the nest and the risk of predation in more visible nests. The relationships between nest characteristics and breeding success and survival probabilities of Eurasian magpie (Pica pica) eggs and nestlings were studied in Baghbadaran, central Iran during the 2008 and 2010 breeding seasons. Nesting success was modelled to assess the relationships between nest parameters and the probability of daily nest survival. Mean clutch and brood size, hatching, fledging and breeding success did not vary significantly between the two years. Mean internal diameter, external diameter, distance to feeding location and distance to open areas varied significantly between the two study years. Daily nest survival rate for both years (2008 and 2010) was 0.98 ± 0.002. Nest size and status of nests, defined as old or newly established nests, were the best factors predicting probabilities of nest survival. Nests with small internal diameters had higher overall nest productivity. Nest height was positively correlated with both fledging success and breeding success. Our results agree with previous findings that have shown that magpie pairs with large nests provided their nestlings with higher quality food compared with pairs with smaller nests and so nest size was an indicator of parental ability. Nest height is also recognized as an important determinant of nest predation, mostly because it may affect nest detectability and accessibility.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Hugh Ford for kindly improving the earlier draft. Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable suggestions for improving the manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.