347
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CLINICAL CASE APPLICATIONS

Interventional Use of the Parent–Child Interaction Assessment–II Enactments: Modifying an Abused Mother's Attributions to Her Son

, , , &
Pages 397-408 | Received 23 Oct 2006, Published online: 11 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

We describe the assessment and treatment of a mother who was a victim of domestic violence and of her 10-year-old son, both of whom were living in a domestic violence shelter. The Parent–Child Interaction Assessment–II Modifying Attributions of Parents intervention (PCIA–II/MAP; CitationBohr, 2005; CitationBohr et al., 2008; CitationBohr & Holigrocki, 2005) is a structured brief treatment using video recordings from a parent's play with his or her child. The play involves using toy people and animals to complete story stems related to a trip to the zoo (see CitationHoligrocki, Kaminski, & Frieswyk, 1999, Citation2002). The therapist shows the parent video excerpts of the interaction, invites reflection and commentary, and collaborates with the parent to change how she makes sense of her child's behaviors. The pretreatment assessment revealed a depressed, fearful, highly stressed mother with a harsh parenting style. Her son experienced significant distress; had behavior problems; and viewed adults as harsh, fragile, irresponsible, and unavailable. Posttreatment gains were evident in the parent's reduced depression and greater parenting sensitivity; however, parenting stress and child behavior problems remained elevated. We emphasize the utility and application of a multimodal assessment that integrates rating scales, free response, and video-recorded interactions.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Julian Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, and its staff for their cooperation. The treatment research of which this case study is a part was supported by the InQuery Collaborative Grant, University of Indianapolis. Selections from this article were presented at the March 2006 symposium Collaborative Feedback at the Society of Personality Assessment Annual Meeting in San Diego.

Notes

a Usually reverse scored, transformed for ease of comparison with other measures. Asterisks highlight scale elevations whereby

∗ = borderline or marginal significance and

∗∗ = clinical or prominent significance based upon cutoffs established in test manuals.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.