960
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development and Initial Validation of the Persevering Hope Scale: Measuring Wait-Power in Four Independent Samples

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 58-73 | Received 02 Feb 2021, Accepted 20 Dec 2021, Published online: 01 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Hope has been conceptualized as agency and pathways to achieve goals. However, this goal-directed conceptualization does not encapsulate all situations in which hope may be beneficial. To address the dispositional motivation to endure when a desired goal seems unattainable, unlikely, or even impossible (i.e., goal-transcendent hope), we provide initial psychometric evidence for the new Persevering Hope Scale (PHS). We developed and refined the PHS with undergraduates at a public college (Study 1) and replicated our findings in a community adult sample (Study 2). We replicated and extended these findings using longitudinal data with undergraduates at a faith-based college (Study 3) and a community sample of chronically ill adults (Study 4), and examined measurement invariance (Study 5). Scores on the PHS demonstrated robust evidence of estimated internal consistency and of criterion-related, convergent/discriminant, and incremental validity. Estimated temporal stability was modest. Partial scalar invariance was evidenced across samples, and full scalar invariance was evidenced across gender, race/ethnicity, and time. These preliminary findings suggest that the PHS is a psychometrically sound measure of persevering hope. Its use can broaden the current body of literature on trait hope to include goal-transcendent hope and advance research on the nature and benefits of this important construct.

Video Abstract

Read the transcript

Watch the video on Vimeo

© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Disclosure statement

There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the following authors upon reasonable request: Study 1 (JMM), Study 2 (EBD), and Study 3 (SYR). Data for Study 4 are publicly available (https://osf.io/2anvx/).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Wheaton College Alumni Association to the first author (SYR).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.