134
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of Covid-19 Emergency and Associated Lockdown Policies on the Normative Expectations for the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS)

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 448-458 | Received 23 Oct 2022, Accepted 19 Nov 2023, Published online: 12 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

Standardized personality tests compare the test taker’s scores to those of a large sample of individuals representing normative expectations. However, what is psychologically normal in one historical context may not be similarly normal in another, so the recent spread of a new coronavirus, SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19), may have implications for what should normally be expected of a nonclinical person taking a personality test shortly after this dramatic event. To address this research question, we administered the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) to 60 nonclinical volunteers from Italy and compared their scores with the official normative reference values of the two tests, which had been established before COVID-19. The results of a series of two-sample t-tests indicated that our newly collected sample appeared somewhat less psychologically healthy compared with normative expectations, and these discrepancies were more pronounced on the PAI than on the R-PAS. Implications and future perspectives are discussed.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments for this project are due to the Society for Personality Assessment (SPA), which has funded 500$ to cover part of the costs (e.g., compensation for participants and payment of travels).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Authors are willing to share their data set upon reasonable request. To obtain the data set associated with this article, please contact the corresponding author at [email protected]

Notes

1 The use of Glass’s formula instead of Hedge’s or Cohen’s formulas to calculate the values of d is more accurate in the context of the present study because the parameter used in the denominator of Glass’s formula is based on a much larger sample size, i.e., the sample size of the normative reference sample of R-PAS and PAI (as opposed to the sample size of the present study). It should be noted, however, that the results obtained using the Hedge’s or Cohen’s formulas are nearly identical to those reported here and are available as online supplementary materials (Tables S1, S2, and S3).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.