Publication Cover
The Journal of Psychology
Interdisciplinary and Applied
Volume 153, 2019 - Issue 8
705
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Examination of Aggressive Beliefs and Attitudes in Relation to Political Affiliation and Candidate Endorsement in the United States

Pages 803-819 | Received 25 Jan 2018, Accepted 16 May 2019, Published online: 12 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Social cognition provides insight into why Americans are largely divided with strong partisan rifts. The purpose of this set of studies was to examine social cognitive forms of aggression in relation to political party affiliation and political candidate endorsement. In Study 1 (N = 1,657), all forms of aggressive social cognitions (hostile attribution, potency, retribution, victimization by powerful others, derogation of target, and social discounting) were significantly associated with one or more political parties in some respect (Democrat, Republican, Independent). In Study 2 (N = 579), participants who endorsed Bernie Sanders reported higher scores on victimization, while participants who endorsed Donald Trump reported scores high on potency (social cognitive forms of aggression were unrelated to support for Hillary Clinton or Ted Cruz beyond political ideology). Results suggest that current political division goes beyond mere differences in political ideology as fundamental aggression-related individual differences appear to covary with how partisans see political parties and primary candidates. Implications include the potential application of our findings to better managing political interpersonal dynamics. For example, knowing that divergent political beliefs and behaviors are associated with fundamental differences in how people perceive the same stimuli may ease partisan hostility, facilitate dialog, and increase willingness to compromise.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Jesse S. Michel

Jesse S. Michel is an associate professor and director of the Industrial and Organizational Psychology program at Auburn University. His research is broadly focused on the work-life interface, personality and individual differences in the workplace, and workplace aggression and abuse.

Joseph R. Bardeen

Joseph R. Bardeen is a licensed clinical psychologist and associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Auburn University. His research is broadly focused on information processing and emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of fear- and anxiety-related pathology.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.