ABSTRACT
Twelve experiments have been conducted using ground stone tools. The used surfaces of these experimental tools have been studied to determine whether definable differences occur in the use-wear patterns. At low-power magnification a difference is observed that is related to the type of material worked against the stone. Concepts borrowed from tribology help to explain the damage that is done to the used surface. Taken together these experiments and the explanatory powers of tribology have exciting implications for better analysis of ground stone tools that can then strengthen the interpretation of prehistoric activities.