186
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From craft to qualified building labour in britain: a comparative approach

Pages 473-493 | Published online: 18 Aug 2006
 

Abstract

The paper sets out to pinpoint and explain the position of building labour in Britain today through a historical and comparative approach. Wage relations and the division of labour in the building industry are traced through different stages of development, from the crafts and statutory trades of feudalism to the collectively bargained skills and the social-partner-negotiated qualifications of capitalism. It is shown how, since the 1970s, the progressive development of building labour has been stalled with the continued adherence to traditional trade divisions, the reassertion of managerial prerogative and the decline in direct employment, collective bargaining and training. This stagnation in development is especially apparent from comparison with the situation in Germany and The Netherlands, where qualification-based rather than output-based wage relations and industry-wide rather than trade-based skill structures are prevalent. The construction labour process today in Britain remains strongly craft based with little possibility of progressing to higher technical and professional levels, unlike the permeability of continental systems. This craft form of production is shown to be associated with a relatively narrowly skilled and casually employed workforce and with relatively low levels of productivity and industrial democracy.

Notes

 Dobb, Wages, 2.

 Smith, Wealth of Nations, 4.

 Janssen, ‘Three Theses on the Division of Labour in Building Production.’

 Janssen, ‘Building Labour.’

 Alford and Barker, History of the Carpenters Company, 81–82, 116; Unwin, The Guilds and Companies of London, 311; Welch, History of the Worshipful Company of Paviours, 26–34, 47, 50.

 Statute 5 Elizabeth I, c 4; Clarke, Building Capitalism, 44–7; Deakin, ‘The Legal Origins of Wage Labour.’

 Perry, The Evolution of British Manpower Policy, xxiii.

 Bell, A Short History of the Worshipful Company of Tylers and Bricklayers, 39–40; Hoskins, ‘The Rebuilding of Rural England;’ Reddaway, The Rebuilding of London after the Great Fire, 115–16; Janssen, ‘Disparities Constituting the Dynamics of Modes of Production,’ 167.

 Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism, 236.

 Smith, Wealth of Nations, 90–91, 107–14, 117–18.

 Derry, ‘The Repeal of the Apprenticeship Clauses of the Statute of Apprentices,’ 74–81.

 Clarke, ‘Historical Stages and the Development of Wage Forms in the British Construction Industry,’ 33.

 Price, Masters, Unions and Men; Postgate, The Builders’ History.

 Howell, ‘Trade Unions, Apprentices and Technical Education,’ 851.

 Samuelson Commission, Report of the Royal Commission on Technical Instruction.

 Hilton, Foes to Tyranny, 180–99; Postgate, The Builders’ History, 245–50.

 Cole, The Payment of Wages, 11–13.

 Ministry of Works, Wages, Earnings and Negotiating Machinery in the Building Industry since 1886.

 See Bercusson, Fair Wages Resolution; Tallard, ‘Metiér et branche,’ 246.

 Druker, ‘Wage Forms in Construction,’ 48.

 Lang, City and Guilds of London Institute.

 Bray, ‘The Apprenticeship Question,’ 414.

 Clarke, ‘The Changing Structure and Significance of Apprenticeship,’ 35.

 Taylor and Thompson, Concrete Costs; Gilbreth, Bricklaying Systems.

 Allen, ‘Incentives in the Building Industry,’ 595–96.

 Clarke, ‘Particularities in Wage Relations,’ 76.

 CITB, A Plan for Training Operative Skills.

 Lanove, The Wage Cost in the European Construction Industry; Pellegrini, Collective Bargaining in the Construction Industry.

 CITB, A Plan for Training Operative Skills.

 Construction Industry Joint Council (CIJC), Working Rule Agreement for the Construction Industry.

 Richter, ‘Qualifications in the German Construction Industry.’

 CITB, Trainee Numbers Survey and Skills Foresight Report.

 Clarke and Wall, ‘UK Construction Skills in the Context of European Developments,’ 555–56.

 Clarke and Wall, Skills and the Construction Process, 56.

 Clarke and Herrmann, ‘Cost Versus Production: Disparities in Social Housing Construction,’ 524–26.

 Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Construction Statistics Annual; Deutsche Bauindustrie, Baustatistisches Jahrbuch.

 Phelps Brown, Report of the Committee of Enquiry.

 DTI, Construction Statistics Annual.

 Ribeill, ‘Une forme archaique d’organisation sociale.’

 Innovative Manufacturing Initiative (IMI), Standardisation and Skills.

 CITB, Trainee Numbers Survey.

 Steedman, ‘Mathematics in Vocational Youth Training for the Building Trades.’

 Clarke and Wall, Skills and the Construction Process.

 Steedman, ‘A Decade of Skill Formation in Britain and Germany.’

 Clarke and Wall, ‘UK Construction Skills in the Context of European Developments,’ 562–63.

 Clarke and Herrmann, ‘Cost vs Production: Labour Deployment and Productivity in Social Housing,’ 1065.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.