28
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Molecular Evolution

Molecular systematics of Clavicipitaceae supporting monophyly of genus Epichloë and form genus Ephelis

, , , &
Pages 431-441 | Accepted 09 Jan 1997, Published online: 28 Aug 2018
 

Abstract

The family Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota) is comprised of fungi with perithecia borne on stromata, unitunicate asci, and filamentous, multiseptate ascospores. All are biotrophic symbionts, either mutualistic with plant hosts or pathogenic to plants, invertebrate animals or other fungi. Genera of plant- associated Clavicipitaceae (tribes Balansieae and Clavicipieae) are distinguished, in part, by stromal and ascus morphology, ascospore germination patterns, whether sclerotia are formed, and host interactions. Their anamorphs include enteroblastic microconidial states, classified in anamorphic genera Neotyphodium and Sphacelia (for teleomorphs Atkinsonella, Claviceps, Echinodothis, and Epichloë), and holoblastic macroconidia, classified in the anamorphic genus Ephelis (teleomorphs Atkinsonella, Balansia, and Myriogenospora). Epichloë species often are mutualistic with grass hosts, and are ancestral to asexual, seed transmitted endophytes symbiotic with many cool-season grasses. Partial 28S nuclear rDNA sequences were determined from isolates of five species and two undescribed mating populations of Epichloë, one asexual Epichloë hybrid (Neotyphodium coenophialum), and representatives of six other genera in the family. Results from phylogenetic analysis of the sequences supported monophyly of plant-associated Clavicipitaceae, with insect-pathogenic Cordyceps species more deeply rooted. Four clades were distinguished among plant-associated Clavicipitaceae: a monophyletic genus Epichloë (including N. coenophialum), a monophyletic genus Claviceps, a clade represented only by Echinodothis tuberiformis, and a clade including all sampled strains with Ephelis anamorphs. Morphological relationships of anamorphs and ascospore development better fit the molecular phylogenetic relationships than did host relationships or host tissue specificity.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.