305
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematics

Many were named, but few are current: The Hebeloma of Hesler, Smith, and coauthors

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 813-870 | Received 09 Feb 2023, Accepted 24 Jun 2023, Published online: 27 Sep 2023
 

ABSTRACT

During the 1970s and 1980s, L. R. Hesler and A. H. Smith, alone, together, or Smith with other authors such as V. S. Evenson and D. H. Mitchel, described numerous North American taxa in Hebeloma. With the inclusion of an early work by Smith and a later work by E. Grilli, who described a species based on material from Smith, 130 taxa were described and form the subject of this paper. Apart from two taxa that were (deliberately) invalidly published and two that were illegitimately published, all others are valid and legitimate names. After study of morphology, habitat, and location of collection (based on available material and information) as well as molecular analysis (insofar as this was successful), of these 128 validly published taxa we regard 14 as being current names; the remaining 114 are synonymized with other current names. These 14 species are Hebeloma albomarginatum, H. alpinicola, H. angelesiense, H. caulocystidiosum, H. immutabile, H. incarnatulum, H. kelloggense, H. mackinawense, H. nitidum, H. olympianum, H. parcivelum, H. praeolidum, H. pungens, and H. sporadicum. This brings up the number of currently recognized, validly published, Hebeloma species in America to 72.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very much obliged to A. Bogaerts and P. Ballings of the Botanic Garden Meise (BR) for help with handling various loans from a variety of herbaria. We also thank these herbaria for their help: ARIZ, C, CAVA, CMMF, CSU, DAOM, DBG, DENA, E, F, FLAS, G, HSC, IB, K, KRAM, MICH, MIN, NYS, O, OULU, PUL, QFB, STU, SWGC, TAES, TENN, TROM, TURA, UBC, UCSC, WAG, WTU, and ZT. We are grateful to the numerous mycologists who have sent us their collections to study and their photographs to use. We are indebted to R. Lebeuf, D. P. Lewis, C. L. Ovrebo, R. L. Pastorino, N. Siegel, and D. Wasilewski for allowing us to publish their photographs here. We thank the reviewers and the editor for their helpful comments and suggestions.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2023.2230538

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Henry J. Beker.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.