1,292
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A standardised sampling protocol for robust assessment of reach-scale fish community diversity in wadeable New Zealand streams

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 177-187 | Received 13 Oct 2009, Published online: 06 Sep 2010
 

Abstract

The New Zealand fish fauna contains species that are affected not only by river system connectivity, but also by catchment and local-scale changes in landcover, water quality and habitat quality. Consequently, native fish have potential as multi-scale bioindicators of human pressure on stream ecosystems, yet no standardised, repeatable and scientifically defensible methods currently exist for effectively quantifying their abundance or diversity in New Zealand stream reaches. Here we report on the testing of a back-pack electrofishing method, modified from that used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, on a wide variety of wadeable stream reaches throughout New Zealand. Seventy-three first- to third-order stream reaches were fished with a single pass over 150–345 m length. Time taken to sample a reach using single-pass electrofishing ranged from 1–8 h. Species accumulation curves indicated that, irrespective of location, continuous sampling of 150 stream metres is required to accurately describe reach-scale fish species richness using this approach. Additional species detection beyond 150 m was rare (<10%) with a single additional species detected at only two out of the 17 reaches sampled beyond this distance. A positive relationship was also evident between species detection and area fished, although stream length rather than area appeared to be the better predictor. The method tested provides a standardised and repeatable approach for regional and/or national reporting on the state of New Zealand's freshwater fish communities and trends in richness and abundance over time.

Acknowledgements

Data were supplied by the Department of Conservation (Waikato Conservancy), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research (NIWA under contract for Environment Waikato) and five Regional councils (Auckland, Waikato, Horizons, Wellington, Otago). A large number of people contributed to collecting the data contained within this work. In particular, we recognise the efforts of Eric Brown, Peter Hancock, Mike Joy, Wendy Davies, Paul Franklin, Joshua Smith, Louise Mack, Rebecca Lander, Brenda Aldridge, Melany Ginders, Britta Deichmann and Gerry Kessels. Thanks to Clint Prior for numerous formatting and design iterations to the protocol datasheets and to Laura Drummond for extracting and supplying raw NZFFDB information. Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments that improved this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.