In this article the literature concerning lay subjects' understanding of the risk concept is reviewed and discussed. Empirical findings suggest that the lay conception of risk is multidimensional and deviates from the normative (“statistical”) models of risk. Four different qualitative dimensions are identified in lay subjects' risk perception: A potency dimension, a novelty dimension, an exposure dimension, and an active-passive dimension. These dimensions contribute to explain lay subjects' perceptions of magnitude of risk, acceptability of risk, and their attitudes towards risk management. A lack of correspondance between predictors of perceived risk and subjectively perceived reasons for risk evaluations indicates that subjects may not be fully aware of the factors that motivate their risk perceptions.
Subjektive determinanter for lekfolks risikovurderinger
Lay perception of risk
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.