It can be useful to comprehend the papers in this special edition of the Norwegian Journal of Geography in terms of the paradoxical antithesis between dialectical oppositions and totalizing thinking, with its tendency to mythologize itself. The question of the truth of myth also applies to the totalizing narratives geographers apply to the understanding of their discipline. To construct a unified discipline one needs to produce disciplinary narratives that construct the image of a unified whole, a totality with a given 'nature'. To escape the totalitarian power of such frameworks, however, these images need to be counterpoised to the oppositions against which they are generated. The discipline is thus defined by the paradoxical tension between modes of thought that seek to define the nature of geography by seeking images of wholeness and unity, and those that emphasize difference and opposition.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.