Ecological knowledge is important if phosphate analysis is to become a useful tool for the archaeologist. The author mentions variation in natural phosphate content, solifluction, drifting sand, iron pan, different land use, and the vegetation and climate as examples of factors which must be taken into consideration before sampling and discussion of the results. On this basis a critical evaluation is made of some papers dealing with phosphate analysis applied to archaeology. The author claims that a rapid field test can in many cases make the much more laborious laboratory procedure unnecessary, and gives examples of the use of the spot test from areas with summer farming, settlements from the Iron Age and Mesolithic Age, modern farming, and cattle tracks. A trained person can sample and analyse some hundred samples a day, and this compensates for the low accuracy of the spot test.
Phosphate analysis in archaeology ‐ problems and recent progress
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.