Abstract
Computing in the energy dimension is one of the greatest challenges confronting present-day deterministic neutron transport solvers. Accurately resolving the neutron flux as neutrons downscatter across resonances in the nuclear cross sections currently requires considerable computing power and suffers from approximation errors. Flux uncertainty resulting from the uncertainty of the resonance structure is the single-largest cause of reactivity uncertainty. Any additional reference solution for the critical neutron downscattering problem with resonance phenomena would be a boon to verification and validation of neutronics codes.
This paper establishes a benchmark to verify the accuracy of neutron transport criticality solvers along the energy dimension. For the first time, the analytic solution of the flux amplitude is derived in the particular case of an infinite homogeneous medium with isotropic scattering in the center of mass and an arbitrary number of no-threshold, neutral particle reaction resonances (e.g., radiative capture, fission, and resonance scattering). Original analytic expressions are established to quantify the discrepancy between the and flux amplitudes, respective solutions of the multiplication factor , or the exponential time-evolution frequency eigenproblems. The physical study of these relations led to analysis of their first-order relative difference near the criticality condition . Finally, numerical solutions are provided to a benchmark problem constituted of the first resonance of 239Pu, the 6.67-eV resonance of 238U, and a scattering isotope with a flat cross section, allowing for the computational verification of the energy resolution of current neutron transport criticality codes. Through these novel results, this analytic benchmark can serve as a reference to verify the energy resolution and sensitivity analysis of neutron transport criticality calculations.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.
Acknowledgments
The authors are truly indebted to Andrew Holcomb of Oak Ridge National Laboratory for his assistance in validating the analytic benchmark problem with SCALE 6.2.3. The second author, P. Ducru, was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors, an Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation of Nuclear Reactors under U.S. Department of Energy contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725.
Notes
a Note that there is no approximation or discrepancy here because neutrons can theoretically downscatter to zero energy whereas the lower-energy boundary in this work has been set to Neutrons are allowed to downscatter below energy if is chosen, but here, those neutrons are simply defined to be immediately absorbed.
b Isotropic scattering is defined as equiprobable in the cosine of the angle in the COM. This transforms to a probability density function of in the cosine of the scattering angle in the laboratory. Then, the above equation is integrated over in the azimuthal angle and over in the cosine of the laboratory angle.
c In developing this analytic benchmark, the gracefulness of the numerical solution techniques was not the main objective. The elegance of the solution presented here is the compact parameterization of the flux (and reaction rate) in continuous energy in Eq. (48).