45
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Curious Inconsistency: Coeducation in Secondary Education in the Netherlands, 1900–1960

Pages 273-292 | Published online: 20 May 2015
 

Abstract

During the first half of this century, a curious inconsistency existed in girls' secondary education in the Netherlands. On the one hand a majority of educationalists repeated objections against coeducation for girls over twelve. On the other hand the greater number of girls—or indeed their parents—continued to prefer mixed schooling. This article examines the arguments brought forward. It also tries to give an explanation of the enduring and remarkable agreement among educationalists who came from very different cultural backgrounds, such as feminism, educational reformism, orthodox Calvinism, and Roman Catholicism. The majority of the arguments turned out to be of a didactic or psychological nature. Furthermore, the arguments appear to be based on a naturalistic concept of gender differences, as represented by leading psychological theories. During the fifties, a phenomenological or culturalistic approach of the human mind became dominant. “Then coeducation stopped being considered as harmful to the “natural” development of adolescent girls.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.