Perspectives on family and fertility in developing countries

Abstract

Two aspects of the family in relation to fertility in developing countries are discussed: set stratification within the family and extended family networks. As both these are central to J. C. Caldwell's theory of fertility transition, the paper is structured as a critique of his position. Drawing on examples and data from Asia, it is argued that the causal significance of sex stratification for fertility lies in the economic risks it imposes on women, deriving from their dependence on men, rather than, as Caldwell suggests, in the disproportionate gain that men derive from their dominant position within families. While Caldwell and others associate strong extended family networks of mutual obligation and support with persistent high fertility, it is argued here that such systems should, instead, facilitate fertility decline. Close-knit and strong kin networks can be viewed as alternatives to children as sources of insurance, and may facilitate fertility decline by preventing children from becoming the focal point of parental concerns for security.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Seminar on Family Types and Fertility in Less Developed Countries, sponsored jointly by the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population and the Associacão Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais, São Paulo, Brazil, 5–8 August, 1981.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Seminar on Family Types and Fertility in Less Developed Countries, sponsored jointly by the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population and the Associacão Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais, São Paulo, Brazil, 5–8 August, 1981.

Notes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Seminar on Family Types and Fertility in Less Developed Countries, sponsored jointly by the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population and the Associacão Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais, São Paulo, Brazil, 5–8 August, 1981.