Preview
Physicians know that thrombolysis has marked benefits in patients with certain classic findings after acute myocardial infarction. However, some do not realize that thrombolysis has relatively limited risks and can be administered to many more patients than it is at present. The authors review current indications and contraindications and summarize results of major clinical studies that compare currently available thrombolytic agents.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Vincent M. Figueredo
Vincent M. Figueredo, MD Thomas M. Amidon, MD Christopher L. Wolfe, MD Dr Figueredo (right) is assistant professor of medicine, Dr Amidon (left) is assistant clinical professor of medicine, and Dr Wolfe (middle) is associate professor of medicine and radiology and associate director, coronary care unit, department of cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Thomas M. Amidon
Vincent M. Figueredo, MD Thomas M. Amidon, MD Christopher L. Wolfe, MD Dr Figueredo (right) is assistant professor of medicine, Dr Amidon (left) is assistant clinical professor of medicine, and Dr Wolfe (middle) is associate professor of medicine and radiology and associate director, coronary care unit, department of cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Christopher L. Wolfe
Vincent M. Figueredo, MD Thomas M. Amidon, MD Christopher L. Wolfe, MD Dr Figueredo (right) is assistant professor of medicine, Dr Amidon (left) is assistant clinical professor of medicine, and Dr Wolfe (middle) is associate professor of medicine and radiology and associate director, coronary care unit, department of cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.