152
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Focus: Pain management - Original Research

Are postoperative pain and patient satisfaction influenced by the number of ports in VATS for malignant pleural effusion treatment?

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 62-65 | Received 17 Aug 2019, Accepted 22 Nov 2019, Published online: 24 Jan 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this research is by using sociological methods of scientific research for tracking the pain and satisfaction indicators to prove that decreasing the number of ports in the VATS (Video-assisted thoracic surgery) for Malignant Pleural Effusion reduces postoperative pain and improves patient’s satisfaction.

Methods: Our study included 117 VATS procedures performed in the period from 01 January 2013 to 31 September 2016. The sociological method used to measure the pain indicator was an interview. The severity of postoperative pain was determined and reported according to a ten-point pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The degree of satisfaction was determined and reported according to a six-point and ten-point grading systems on the basis of a research interview procedure.

Results: In the single-port method, the verbal pain scale for all the days covered by the research study statistically showed significantly lower values (P ˂ 0.0001) in comparison with the conventional method (P ˂ 0.0001). With regard to the patient’s satisfaction, determined on the basis of the six-point system, the results were as follows: conventional VATS approach – average 3.1 with a standard deviation of 1.1 and ranging from 0 to 5; single-port VATS approach – average 4.3 with a standard deviation of 1.0 and within the range from 0 to 6. Conventional VATS approach – 6.8 – neutral. Single-port VATS approach – 8.1 – prevailing satisfaction.

Conclusions: Based on our study and the studies of other authors, it can be concluded that postoperative pain and satisfaction after VATS in patients with MPE (Malignant pleural effusion) are influenced by the number of ports and the one-port technique shows better results than the conventional three-port method.

The research study was registered and approved by the Clinical Research and Ethics Committee at the ‘Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich’ AD University Multi-Profile Hospital for Active Treatment Hospital, Stara Zagora. According to Protocol No. 11, Ref. No. 12471/30.10.2015 approved are the methods used by the sociological research study which uses predefined indicators to track patients who have undergone conventional VATS and single-port VATS. Indicators: postoperative pain and satisfaction.

Disclosure of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding this article. Also the research was self-funded and the authors did not receive any funds for their work on this research.

The contents of the paper and the opinions expressed within are those of the authors, and it was the decision of the authors to submit the manuscript for publication.

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.