216
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical focus: Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nephrology - Original research

Serological markers facilitate the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease

& ORCID Icon
Pages 286-290 | Received 06 Oct 2020, Accepted 06 Jan 2021, Published online: 02 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background and aim: The diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) is challenging. Ongoing search for biomarkers to facilitate the diagnosis is a worthwhile endeavor. The aim of this study was to explore the role of serological markers in the diagnosis of CD at an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) referral center.

Methods: This was a retrospective study including 196 suspected CD patients. The expression of ASCA-IgG, ASCA-IgA, AYMA-IgG, AYCA-IgA, FI2Y-IgG, and pANCA in the patient’s serum was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IF).

Results: ASCA was a relatively specific marker for CD (p = 0.0005), but not AYMA-IgG, AYCA-IgA, F12Y-IgG (p = 0.5936, 0.7974, 0.1085, respectively). However, a high sensitivity of 96.77% (95% CI 90.19%-99.83%) was noted for ASCA+/FI2Y+ to identify CD patients among the suspected cases, albeit with low PPV. The more combinations of serological markers, the higher sensitivity, and NPV. No correlation was found between the age of onset or disease location and the expression of ASCA, AYMA, AYCA, FI2Y, or pANCA. There was no significant difference between the expression of ASCA and the disease behavior at diagnosis (p = 0.3307). However, a decreased proportion of AYMA+ CD patients was found in those who received surgery compared with their non-surgical counterparts (p = 0.0488).

Conclusions: ASCA was found to be the most accurate serological marker for the differential diagnosis of CD. Combinations of ASCA, AYMA, AYCA, and FI2Y improved diagnostic accuracy of CD.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The contents of the paper and the opinions expressed within are those of the authors, and it was the decision of the authors to submit the manuscript for publication.

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was received to produce this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.