The Dying Role: Its Relevance to Improved Patient Care

Abstract

SOCIETY is failing to meet the obligation it has to its dying members. Persons with terminal illnesses suffer isolation and neglect in hospitals, receive overzealous treatment by physicians, and are kept in ignorance of their situation by families and medical personnel. Evidence for these statements has come from observers of the medical care system and from dying patients themselves (Kübler-Ross, 1969; Reynolds and Kalish, 1974; Sudnow, 1967). In the nineteenth century it was common for persons to die in the familiar environs of their homes, surrounded by grieving families from whom they parted in a meaningful manner (Blauner, 1966). Dying persons of today no longer fill a well-defined social role. Instead, the distinction between the roles of sick and dying persons has been lost and, in the resulting confusion, the care of dying people has suffered. The purpose of this article is to clarify the distinction between the dying and sick roles, identify the signs of existing role confusion, suggest ways in which this confusion may be corrected, and show how reestablishment of the dying role can result in improved care of dying people. The important part physicians play in defining sick and dying roles will be emphasized.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Russell Noyes

Russell Noyes, Jr., MD, is Associate Professor of Psychiatry. John Clancy, MD, FRCP, is Professor of Psychiatry. Both are associated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa.

Originally published in Psychiatry, 40(1), 41–47.

John Clancy

Russell Noyes, Jr., MD, is Associate Professor of Psychiatry. John Clancy, MD, FRCP, is Professor of Psychiatry. Both are associated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa.

Originally published in Psychiatry, 40(1), 41–47.