In this reconsideration of social knowledge, an attempt is made to resolve ambiguities related to the original project. Three regions of dispute fostered by the initial essay are examined and explained: first, the definition of social knowledge; second, the issue of form; third, the problem of normative impact.
Quarterly Journal of Speech
Volume 64, 1978 - Issue 3
![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
“Voice” and “voicelessness” in rhetorical studies
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Beyond rhetorical relativism: A structural‐material model of truth and objective reality
Source:
Informa UK Limited
The Narrative Paradigm: in the Beginning
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis
Source:
Informa UK Limited
William James and the epistemic view of rhetoric
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Linking provided by
