Abstract
In this essay, Professor Perelman explains “certain errors” in The New Rhetoric and critically responds to several writers who have used his ideas in this country. Trans. by Professor Ray D. Dearin.
Quarterly Journal of Speech
Volume 70, 1984 - Issue 2
![Sample our Language & Literature journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5941/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Language-Literature.jpg"})
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
On the processing of arguments
Source:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived
Source:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Between Motion and Action: The Dialectical Role of Affective Identification in Kenneth Burke
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Linking provided by
